Thanks to Peat @ Peat Long’s Blog for tagging me in this via Twitter at the end of May. These questions have a SFF bent. Overall, the tag addresses a lot of common bookish topics I don’t think I’ve talked about here before, so you might learn something new about my reading habits!
The Tag
๐ Would you rather read from a hardback, paperback or e-book?
Paperback (trade, not mass market). I like books where the pages fall open and feel soft in my hand. Paperback books are generally easier for me to hold as well. But I actually read hardcover most often. For my own shelves, I purchase hardcover whenever possible for the aesthetic and longevity. I’ll read e-books if I have to. As an ‘international’ blogger, I’m offered digital ARCs. This year, my e-reading has increased, as borrowing an e-book has been the only way to acquire new releases from the library.
๐ Would you rather crack the spine of a paperback book or ruin a hardbackโs dust jacket?
Yikes, I’ll crack the spine, I guess. I keep my books in pristine condition as best I can. In this scenario, I value a dust jacket more than an unbroken spine.
๐ Would you prefer info dump on a world/magic system to a drip-feed technique?
Over the years, I’ve learnt I prefer drip-feed. I enjoy figuring out how a world or magic functions. I particularly love when the characters in a story know something about the world that you, the reader, don’t, and when that something is casually revealed, it hits you in a certain way and evolves your understanding of the narrative. (Deeplight and Never Let Me Go are great examples of SFF books I recently read that do this.)
๐ Would you rather have a soft magic system or a hard magic system?
I think this question relates to the one above about info dump vs. drip feed. I prefer soft magic. I have often found when a book goes for a hard magic system, I get nitpicky and notice its gaps or flaws, which takes me out of the fantasy. Soft magic highlights what I love most about fantasy – feelings of awe and delight and wonder.
๐ Would you rather jump on board with a book series and wait to see if it gets traction or wait for a successful book series to be brought to your attention?
Hmm, I don’t pay particular attention to series either way. I prefer standalones. …Actually, I realize that means I wait for a successful book series to be brought to my attention. If enough people whose opinions I trust sing praises about a particular series, then I might check out the first book.
๐ Would you rather have dinner with your favourite character or author?
Easy – I’d have dinner with Tolkien. I have never thought about a favourite character I would like to dine with, and I’m sure I could come up with some good ones if I did, but there is so! much! I would love to discuss with Tolkien, I can’t pass up even a hypothetical opportunity.
๐ Would you rather read duologies, trilogies or standalone books?
I gave the answer away in a previous question: I prefer standalones. I do enjoy duologies, though. They have the advantages of both standalones and trilogies without the disadvantages. Room for a story and its characters to develop and grow, without suffering from middle book syndrome. If there were more of them, that’s probably what I would answer. (Please remember that The Lord of the Rings is one book published in three parts, not a trilogy ๐).
๐ Would you rather read self-published or traditionally published authors for 2 years straight?
Traditionally published, no contest. The reasoning why probably deserves its own post.
๐ Would you rather be stuck in your favourite SFF world or your favourite SFF book?
Interesting distinction. I probably wouldn’t want to be stuck in The Lord of the Rings, but I would be happy to be stuck in Middle-Earth maybe one or two hundred years prior…
๐ Would you rather read fantasy or science-fiction?
Fantasy. No surprise there.
๐ Would you rather have your favourite book adapted into a film or into a television series?
I have been treating The Lord of the Rings as my favourite book for the purpose of this post, which has had the film treatment. A few other childhood favourite fantasy books with film adaptations spring to mind, like Inkheart, Eragon, and Artemis Fowl. Notably, those were all terrible adaptations. Perhaps that is the price I pay for enjoying The LotR adaptation so much – I won’t enjoy another adaptation again, haha…
But I haven’t answered the question. Let’s continue with The LotR as my favourite book. I don’t want to see another adaptation of that in my lifetime. I do sometimes daydream about a Peter Jackson style (I think particularly of casting, soundtrack, setting, and cinematography) six film adaptation that more closely follows the structure of the six books.
๐ Would you rather have to reread your least favourite book every month, or never read your favourite book again?
I agree with Peat, who wrote, “That’s a monstrous question”. I will take the least favourite book, though. I know exactly which one it would be. At least it isn’t too long. I can’t give up The Lord of the Rings.
๐ Would you rather secretly love a book everyone else hates, or secretly hate a book everyone else loves?
I have done both, though I don’t generally make a secret of either. If I truly hate a book people loved, I want to discuss why with other readers. Maybe a book is problematic, maybe I didn’t understand something, etc. But this is uncommon. And if I loved a book others hated – same thing. I want to boost that book (or maybe I need to learn that’s it’s actually quite problematic). More often, I feel ‘meh’ when other readers felt ‘WOW’ and in that case I don’t make too big a fuss.
๐ Would you rather dog-ear your book, or never be able to mark your place?
Never mark my place. I have bookmarks and and bookdarts but I don’t use them consistently. I don’t like to dog-ear my books, so I would get by fine without marking my place.
๐ Would you rather listen to your favourite book as an audiobook narrated by the worst narrator ever, or never read it again?
I don’t listen to audiobooks. This is a slightly trickier question than the one above that had ‘never read your favourite book’ as an option. The LotR on audio must be days long. (Ooh, I just checked – it’s 66 hours.) How much would it hurt to hear it read by a bad narrator? But still, I think I would suffer that rather than never read it again. (I’m also assuming I can still read the hardcopy…)
๐ Would you rather have a disappointing end/unfulfilled cliffhanger, or lose your favourite character?
Lose my favourite character. If it’s done well, it hurts but serves a purpose. A disappointing ending can spoil my enjoyment of the entire story.
I tag any SFF readers who haven’t answered these questions before on their blog and would like to. Or drop a comment letting me know if we have the same or different answers to any of these q’s.
All things considered equal, I’d prefer info dumps, and I’m the only person I’ve ever come across that is a fan of them. But I think the tone and type of story definitely should determine how information is parsed out.
I feel like saying that I prefer traditional publishing to self-pub is asking for a bit of trouble, but I do prefer trad. I’ve found some absolute gems in self-pub to be sure, but overall I consistently enjoy trad stories more.
I agree with all your comments re: self-pub. A book goes through very different processes depending whether itโs self or traditionally published, and I donโt think it should be โcontroversialโ to say you prefer one over the other. (I should also clarify I donโt think the trad process is inherently better.)